Debate
“UAE Team Emirates - XRG's dominance is bad for cycling”
Agree35%
Neutral5%
Disagree61%
So, what's your opinion?
The context behind the statement
Nine stages into the 2026 Tour de France, one question keeps returning on the rest day: has UAE Team Emirates-XRG become too strong for the good of the race? Tadej Pogačar leads by more than two and a half minutes, and rivals are running out of ways to respond.
On the Tourmalet he rode away 43 kilometres from the finish and beat Jonas Vingegaard by 2 minutes and 38 seconds. The season-long numbers tell the same story: UAE have 55 wins in 2026, almost double second-placed Red Bull Bora-hansgrohe on 32. Since then the peloton has been split between admiration and frustration.
The sharpest criticism came from Movistar sports director José Joaquín Rojas. He believes the fight for yellow is over and that UAE's control is draining the race of drama. "Pogačar is above everyone else and he has the strongest, most crushing and most dominant team we have seen in recent years," he told EFE.
His real complaint was tactical. On stage nine UAE chased a harmless breakaway instead of letting it go. "UAE can do whatever it wants because this is cycling, but there are also unwritten rules that should be respected," he said. When the strongest team leaves nothing for anyone, he argues, the reward for attacking disappears and "it takes away part of the spectacle."
UAE reject the idea that they should hold back. Florian Vermeersch put it plainly to HLN: "surely we cannot be expected to perform at a lower level just to make it all more exciting?" He also pushed back on the charge of greed. "Every rider and every team would do the same in our situation."
His teammate Tim Wellens understands why others are unhappy, but only to a point. "If I were a rider in a weaker team, I would not enjoy seeing a race completely controlled by the opposition either," he said. The booing on the Tourmalet did not move him. "It means we are doing something right."
Inside the bunch, the mood is closer to disbelief. Alpecin-Premier Tech manager Philip Roodhooft respected the ride but was stunned by the margins. "The difference is so big." Ilan Van Wilder, who finished the Tourmalet stage in pieces, said it more bluntly. "I find it difficult to understand how you can be so dominant." Julian Alaphilippe simply shrugged. "Nothing surprises me anymore."
UAE general manager Mauro Gianetti offers the wider context. He refuses to call the Tour finished and points to the depth of talent still in the race, from Vingegaard to Ayuso, Seixas, Evenepoel and Lipowitz. "The level of this Tour is extremely high," he said. In his telling, UAE are not killing the race, they are simply the best prepared team in a very strong field.
That is the trade-off. A dominant team and a generational rider give the sport a star to build around, but they also risk turning the biggest race of the year into a procession.
So is UAE's dominance bad for cycling, or is punishing everyone else exactly what a great team is supposed to do? Where do you stand?
11 Opinions
Sign into add your opinion. Voting and commenting are free.




Dominance = less attention for the sport.. Especially in a time the sport if facing a crucial period for it's future. It doesn't mean that UAE is to blame, but it is not good that the ranges in budgets (and so the quality of the selections) are widening up
If all the teams were on a level playing field it would be ok. But there are not.
I believe we should just enjoy the spectacle! The peloton will change, Tadej will get older, his abilities decline but he is a special talent. The rest of his team are excellent talents in their own right, but then, so is every other WT cyclist. Without Tadej, would the team still be so dominant? Probably not!
Fortunately the competitive fight for the podium compensates for Pogi’s domination.
Do you really feel that way? For me, the suspense compared to 2022 and 2023 feels completely different, and the level of excitement is not even half as high.
I actually find this tour even more interesting because there are 6 fighting over 2 places. With the rider back stories and Vinge weakness yesterday I think the excitement is great.
Good for you :) For me, that battle for second place is little more than a consolation prize.
Since 2019 Visma have won 10 grand tours and UAE 5. If UAE weren’t there Visma may well have won 15. Similarly without Visma UAE would be even more dominant. Elite sport via competition drives this phenomenon. In coming years it’ll be other teams and riders.
Is there no difference between the way Visma did it (smart improvements & optimizations) versus what UAE is doing now with big spending? It feels that the way Visma did it, is way more easy to copy
A valid point on budgets though Visma are estimated to have €55m per annum (as do Netcompany Ineos) compared to €60m. I think they’re all using the same approach. I imagine the €5m is lost in Pogacar’s salary?
Think the budget gap is closer to 15-20M for Visma to UAE, with Netcompany-Ineos and Red Bull closer to UAE